Guide to Old Houses
  
Advanced Search
Old House Journal .com Old House Journal
Subscribe to the Magazine | Free E-Newsletters
                 
Home Article
Archives
Traditional
Products
Product
Literature
Historic
Preservation
Historic
House Plans
Talk Swaps
& Sales
Restoration
Products

Connect:



Insulation Q&As

What you should know about materials and methods.

By OHJ Staff

Insulation Q&As




Many folks want to do the right thing by adding insulation to an old house. The beneÞts of insulation and its related materials (air and vapor retarders) are lower heating bills in the winter, cheaper air conditioning in the summer, and greater comfort year-round. Unfortunately, these products are nearly as numerous as the contradictory advice and moisture horror stories that surround them.

Each of the following questions represents a common concern about insulating materials in old houses Ñ many of them in the not-so-old category of early- and mid-20th century construction. Once you understand the principles outlined in the answers, youÕll have the basic tools for dealing with the speciÞc insulating conditions in your old house.

Answer: The oil embargoes of the 1970s sparked a rush to insulate buildings of every kind. Blown-in cellulose became a very popular material for old houses: it was quick and cheap to add, and it even covered its costs through reduced heating energy bills. Where this insulation was improperly installed, however, many of us are now paying the price for the paint failures, rotted sills, and frozen pipes it caused.

Blown-in cellulose is simply a shredded paper product. Its light, puffy particles can Þll hard-to-reach voids in the perimeter envelope of a building. This deÞnitely can improve the buildingÕs thermal insulation value. The problem is, air moves easily through this low-density stuff. As warm room air passes through the wall cavity in winter it becomes cooler. If this air has a high moisture vapor content, the water vapor will condense into a liquid, or freeze into frost, and start a vicious cycle of destruction. The condensation will wet the celluloseÑjust like that wet newspaper in the drivewayÑrendering it useless as insulation. Pretty soon the wood siding gets saturated and wonÕt hold paint. High moisture levels in the framing can even promote wood rot or attract wood-eating insects.

I recommend restricting the use of cellulose insulation to extra-dry locations, such as attics, where it can be readily removed if the need arises. DonÕt forget about any water pipes up there. TheyÕll freeze if they wind up on the cold side of newly installed insulation. They must be moved to a heated environment.

Question: What about blown-in fiberglass or vermiculite?

Answer: Like cellulose, these materials are great insulators. Better yet, they are not combustible. (Blown-in cellulose of the past was not always treated with Þre retardant!) Blown-in fiberglass is a very light and puffy matrix of glass Þbers that uses its high percentage of air space to do the work of insulating. Vermiculite (sometimes mistaken for asbestos) is a ßaky, natural rock expanded to a pebble-sized mix that insulates in a similar way. Both these materials will allow air to easily pass through them the same as cellulose. Thus, they too have the potential to become waterlogged in the event of condensation, but to a lesser extent.

Question: Which insulation is best for use in southern humid climates?

Answer: Insulation was first introduced in houses in northern climates where the temperature outdoors drops to minus 10 degrees F or lower. This extreme cold creates a large differential in temperature through a wall between indoors and outdoors. Down south, even when it is 100 degrees F or so outdoors, the differential temperature at a wall is only about half as much as up north, when the room temperature is about 70 degrees F.

With year-round air conditioning being the norm in a southern climate, my primary focus would be on controlling outdoor air inÞltration and its resulting cold-surface condensation. Mold growth is a constant threat as hot, moist outdoor air cools on contact with these surfaces.

Old wood-frame houses down south can attribute their longevity to lots of ventilation, which helps dry out wet surfaces rapidly. Given this, in an old house I would lean towards not using any insulation. Instead, I would reduce inÞltration to a minimum and use the air-conditioning primarily for its ability to dehumidify, thereby keeping the air as dry as possible. On the other hand, in newer construction the use of rigid insulation and outer coatings of stucco or Dryvit work very well. These coatings are excellent barriers to both moisture vapor and inÞltration, and the thermal performance of the rigid insulation is not reduced, if they should get wet.

Question: My walls are not insulated, but the paint on my siding is peeling. Why?

Answer: ItÕs not fair to always blame peeling paint on a poor insulation job. Moisture may indeed be the culprit, but something simpler could be the agent. RooÞng, ßashing, and gutter leaks often cause water to enter a wall cavity. Porous materials like plaster, low-Þred brick, lime mortar, and wood will absorb this water and retain it for several days or weeks. Such moisture can make for poor adhesion at the time of paint application, or it can push what was a good paint job off the house soon after the leak begins.

All these situations have the same solution: a Moisture Inventory. This is a visual inspection of the house using logic to identify and quantify unwanted sources of water (see box). Although moisture generated from a dirt ßoor basement has a long way to migrate, it can easily end up as condensation on the back of siding. Similarly, residential humidiÞers can be very damaging to an improperly insulated old house.

Start your inventory with a ladder and inspect the whole house from a ÒrainÕs eyeÓ perspective. Going a step further, simulate rain with a garden hose and ask a friend to keep a lookout inside the house. Inspections during an actual downpour are the best! Be sure to check for each of the Major Moisture Makers. If no leaks show up, you may well be the victim of a condensation problem.

Major Moisture Makers
SOURCE ESTIMATED MOISTURE OUTPUT (pints)
Combustion exhaust
(from incomplete exhaust of heating fossil fuels)
0 to 6,720+/year
Combustion exhaust
(from unvented kerosene heaters)
7.6/gallons of kerosene burned
Green firewood 400-800/cord/6 months
Ground moisture migration
(from earth crawlspace, etc.)
0 to 105/day
Humidifiers 0 to 120+/day
Plumbing leaks Variable
Rain or snowmelt penetration Variable
Adapted from Moisture Sources Associated with Potential Damage in Cold Climate Housing by William J. Angell and Wanda Olson, University of Minnesota.


Start a discussion on this article in our old-house forum!

Subscribe to our email newsletter!











Get your FREE Trial Issue of Old House Journal and a FREE gift.
Yes! Please send me a FREE trial issue of Old House Journal and a FREE gift.
If I like it and decide to continue, I'll get 7 more issues (8 in all) for just $16.95, a savings of 53%!
If for any reason I decide not to continue, I'll write cancel on the invoice and owe nothing.
The FREE Trial Issue and the FREE Gift are mine to keep, no matter what.
Full Name:
Address 1:
Address 2:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email (req):
Offer valid in US only.
Click here for Canada or here for international subscriptions
From Old House Journal MagazineOld House Products Old House Journal Info from Old House Journal Advertisers Historic Preservation Guidelines Preservation Guides Historic House Plans Old House Forums Swaps and SalesSwaps and Sales Old House Restoration Directory